Sunday, October 21, 2012

The Power of Individual Sin

This week in class, we learned a lot about the sins of King Achaz and how, even though he was horrible and his people were sinning a lot, the kingdom of Yisrael was even worse.  To recap, Achaz became king during the time of Pekach, king of Yisrael.  His rule was stained with sin from the very beginning: He worshiped idols and went so far as to sacrifice his own son in the practice of molech.  On top of this, Achaz did not recognize G-d's control over the world.

The most important thing that happened in the time of Achaz was the war with Aram and Yisrael and the alliance made with Assyria.  At the time, Assyria was the rising world power.  Achaz thought that it would be  better overall if he made an alliance with Assyria and simply let them pass through the land of Yehuda instead of fighting their way in.  Retzin, king of Aram, and Pekach, king of Yisrael, approached Achaz about making an alliance with them to fight off Assyria.  Achaz refused.  His next action is crutial: he made an alliance with a foreign nation when G-d didn't tell him to.  In the end, Retzin and Pekach went to war against Yehuda and Assyria stepped in and won the battle.  The question is: why?  Why didn't Yehuda lose?  They were sinning horribly and probably deserved to lose.  The answer is that Yisrael was doing even worse.  The problem in Yehuda was that the people were being immoral to one another but they still recognized Hashem as G-d and still maintained some aspects of Judaism.  The people of Yisrael had completely strayed from the path of Hashem.  They had started worshiping idols, a path that was started on long ago by Yiravam, the first king of Yisrael who totally rewrote the religion to suit his needs.  The people of Yisrael needed to be punished more at that particular time.

Hashem sent Yishayahu to give a message to Achaz.  As we learned before, Yishayahu's mission had changed and now, he was supposed to keep giving his warnings but no one would listen.  Therefore, Yishayahu went to Achaz prepared for rejection.  He told Achaz exactly what G-d wanted him to do but knew he wouldn't: recognize Hashem's control over the world and stop trying to manage the situation when G-d has it under control.  Yishayahu told Achaz not to worry about the alliance of Yisrael and Aram attacking because G-d is pulling the strings here and will make them lose.  Yishayahu also gave Achaz a sign/mashal: a child will be born and will be named Immanuel.  This child will eat milk and honey before he knows the difference between good and evil.  The message G-d was trying to get across was that if Achaz simply lets Assyria in, they will destroy Yehuda and decimate everything in the land because G-d is pulling the strings and will make it happen.

In my opinion, this story contains a powerful message about the power of individual sin.  How do you get a whole nation to sin?  You start with one person.  That person can influence another who can influence another and so on.  As a teenager in a Jewish school, I have been told all my life about sinning and the consequences.  Until now, it has felt like something I have to deal with later or on Yom Kippur or just another time.  I see now how that kind of thinking can get you in a lot of trouble.  One person leads another to sin and one sin leads to more sins and before you know it, you have a situation similar to that of the one in Yehuda and Yisrael.  That is obviously an extreme case of individual sins joining together to become national sins.

I just thought to mention that leaders' individual sins have a much greater impact than some average Joe living in the middle of the country.  We saw here that Achaz did Avodah Zara and Pekach did as well.  Both of these kings sinned so much and allowed their people to sin to such an extreme extent that in the end, G-d was choosing the lesser of two evils to punish.

3 comments:

  1. I agree with Sarah. One individual has so much power to affect the world in a positive way. However, an individual has this same power to affect the world in a negative way as well. Even though leaders make the important decisions in today's society, the people still have an impact and if they are channeling it in a negative way, it might very well end in a similar situation to the one in Yehudah and maybe, to the one in Yisrael.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with Sarah, I think it was sort of a rippling effect, but I don't think just anyone could have that sort of influence. I think that since אחז was the king, he had far more ability to influence the people into sinning than if it was just an average Joe. It could still happen, but it would take longer and might not have as much damage. אחז being the leader helped move the entire nation into sinning, than just a few groups of people.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree with everyone, like Noga was saying one person has the power to change the world either negatively or positively. It is their decision which derech that they would like to choose. It is like a rumor. One small sentence said by one person turns into a whole story hurting so many people in the middle. People also very commonly let their Yetzer Hara get the best of them. Once they start they cannot stop. In One of the Yom Kippur Al Chets, you are asking for forgiveness for letting your subconscious mind take over your actions. When a person wants something so bad they can trick themselves into thinking that there is nothing wrong with what they are doing. This is like Bnei Yisrael. It could be that one person started it and got another thinking the same-there is nothing wrong with what I am doing. This could lead one to another and eventually to the whole nation. Words are strong.

    ReplyDelete